ANC6B Residents Fault DDOT on 5G Cell Installations

ANC6B Special Meeting Wednesday night to hear from telecommunication industry reps about 5G Cell Plans. Click to enlarge.

Verizon’s Brian Stover shows illustration of his company’s preferred installation of a 5G cell.

Another installation model on a different light pole.

ANC6B Residents Fault DDOT on 5G Cell Installations

by Larry Janezich

Installation of new infrastructure for 5G (fifth-generation cellular wireless) has been under the radar of most residents whose blocks will be affected until recently, when telecommunication companies AT&T, Verizon, and Crown Castle sent out letters notifying neighbors of the pending installation on certain blocks.  The three companies plan to install 7000 of the cells attached to light and utility poles over the next five years – 10% of the 71,000 light poles in the District.  There are currently 26 small cell installations scheduled for ANC6B; most of them appear to be located near the US Capitol, the location driven by the density of users.  Some have described the devices as refrigerators attached to light poles.

The DC Department of Transportation is supporting and authorizing the project, but has left it up to the companies to inform the residents directly affected.  That information, for the most part, that has not penetrated to a neighborhood level until now.  Suddenly, with the installations imminent, there are public concerns about health, safety and aesthetics.

About 50 Capitol Hill residents showed up Wednesday night for a special ANC6B meeting to hear telecommunication representatives explain 5G and to answer questions.  DDOT declined an invitation to attend the meeting.

The companies are desperate for additional capacity, they say, not only because of the advance in technology, but also because demand is degrading the quality of 4G cell phone service.  The companies have selected installation locations according to guidelines established by DC’s Department of Transportation (Public Space Committee), and submitted applications for installation to that agency, which will give final approval.  Industry reps say that once DDOT signs off on a location, it’s pretty much a done deal.  Residents who asked about what recourse they had to oppose a selection got little satisfaction from industry pledges to remain open to resident’s concerns and feedback.

The major concerns raised by residents last night were health and safety, and aesthetics, with the most questions raised about the former.  One attendee said she had small children, and “everybody on the block is very concerned about it.”  Industry reps sought to assure attendees that the amount of electromagnetic radiation produced by the new small cells is “a mere fraction of what is allowed” by federal regulations.

Many residents at the meeting had only recently learned about 5G, and faulted DDOT for not doing a better job of informing the public rather than leaving that task to the telecommunications industry.  Several residents complained that numerous calls to telecommunications reps were not returned.  For its part those industry representatives said that they wanted to be more transparent and identify the individual poles where they intended to install equipment, but DDOT had dictated the content of the form letter which excluded that information.  Part of resident’s frustration was that there was no one present who could talk about what impact combined plans of the three companies would have.

Commissioner Jennifer Samolyk got pledges from the company representatives to attend another meeting in September.  Samolyk said she hoped DDOT would attend the September meeting, agreeing with one resident that “DDOT needs to give us the big picture.”

Here are some links to additional information:

FAQ’s –

Guidelines –

DDOT Website on Small Cells –



Filed under Uncategorized

3 responses to “ANC6B Residents Fault DDOT on 5G Cell Installations

  1. JTKB

    Typical DDOT, safety & health NOT an issue or a value that DDOT shares…don’t expect much more from them.

  2. Valerie

    For health and safety reasons, you really need to know what frequencies, power levels, and related technical parameters are being used–did anyone say that? It wasn’t on the DDOT website. That information should have been submitted to DDOT already by the companies. It doesn’t appear to be available publicly. Sounds like a dc public service commission complaint is warranted.

  3. Valerie

    Oh, and wanted to add: it’s funny to me that they’re doing this at almost the exact same time I have started having difficulties just calling on my cell phone in the neighborhood when I have plenty of connectivity on my phone. Reminds me of when they started putting in Fios here, with hard sellers showing up at doors in bright greenish yellow vests and huge, new problems with my verizon internet connectivity–which turned out to be entirely caused by verizon.