Tag Archives: news

Three Reminders for Saturday and Sunday

Three Reminders for Saturday and Sunday

Posted April 24, 2026

Reminder:  Saturday, April 25 – Benefit for Migrants and Immigrants – St. Mark’s Church

7:30PM

Internationally celebrated group VERONNEAU will perform for a Benefit Concert for Good Neighbors Capitol Hill and Migrant Solidarity Mutual Aid – Saturday, April 25 at 7:30 pm, St. Mark’s Episcopal Church, 301 A Street SE.

Suggested donation $25 or more if you can afford.  Tickets available at the door or online – go here:   https://bit.ly/492r8rk

Fronted by multilingual vocalist Lynn Veronneau and superb guitarist Ken Avis, with special guest, violinist Dave Kline, the VERONNEAU trio weave a tapestry of sound that transcends borders and genres seamlessly blending acoustic bossa nova, swing, folk, and French chanson rooted in melody, groove, and emotional resonance. Don’t miss this wonderful evening of goodwill and good times with friends in our community.  Reception following the performance.

For more on VERONNEAU, go here:  https://veronneaumusic.com/

***

Reminder:  Saturday, April 25 – Mosquito Control Meeting at NE Library

12:30PM – 4:30PM

Itty Bitty Mosquito Population Committee sponsors public meeting at NE Library

Biogents reps, including at least one of their scientists, are joining us for the Ward 6 Spring Clean. They’ll spend the morning out in the neighborhood meeting neighbors where they live, getting a feel for our blocks, and helping think through trap placement strategy live. Afterward, they’ll head to the Northeast Library for a drop-in session where you can come learn more about how the traps work, ask questions and geek out with their scientist if the mood strikes.

For more, go here:  https://www.ittybittymosquitocommittee.org/calendar/biogents-open-house

***

Reminder:  (CORRECTED: SUNDAY, April 26) Congressional Cemetery Spring Fair

11:00aAM – 4:00PM

For more, see here:  https://congressionalcemetery.org/event/spring-fair-2/

Activities include:

11:30   Bee Talk with the Keepers Alliance

1:00     Tree Walk Through History

3:45     Batalá Washington DC – this all woman drum band shares dynamic samba reggae rhythms from the vibrant city of Salvador, Bahia.  If you haven’t seen them perform, here’s a sample video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMiSeu9cl-c

Vendors:

30 vendors featuring natural products, sustainable gifts, handmade crafts, and wholesome eco

treats.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Retail on Capitol Hill: Part I

Retail on Capitol Hill: Part I

by Larry Janezich

Posted April 20, 2026

“Why can’t we have something on Barracks Row besides bars and restaurants?” 

–CHC reader comment 

Small-scale retail – brick and mortar businesses* – are essential to the charm and desirability of the Capitol Hill community.  Even locally owned bars and restaurants are important for the quality of the lifestyle of neighborhood. 

Walking Capitol Hill’s commercial corridors one encounters numerous empty store fronts on Barracks Row, Pennsylvania Avenue, SE, and H Street, NE.  New occupants tend to be restaurant chains.  For many residents, retail on Capitol Hill is less vibrant and less interesting.

The DC Office of Planning has launched a new H Street Land Use and Market Study covering 3rd to 15th Streets NE. The goal of the study is to help shape what gets built, what kind of businesses residents support, how public spaces are designed, and how to strengthen H Street’s identity for the long term.  For more on the study, go here:  https://engage.dc.gov/w68032

So far, how to bring that help to Barracks Row and Pennsylvania Avenue, SE, has not been the coordinated focus of the city or its local institutions.  

ANC6B has floated the idea of a roundtable to bring together commercial stakeholders to brainstorm ideas as to why a better retail mix seems unachievable on Barracks Row.  This is not a new idea. In 2019, ANC6B formed a Working Group on Barracks Row to address challenges facing commercial/retail outlets on 8th Street, SE.  After an initial burst of enthusiasm, the effort dwindled and then faded away without resolving anything.  A proposed moratorium on bars and restaurants on Barracks Row in 2009-2010 likewise went nowhere.  

CHC conducted several interviews to try to better understand the issues in play.  Here are some of the most commonly cited factors that make it difficult for local retail business to survive on Capitol Hill. 

Amazon

It’s easy – just click and buy something on Amazon.

High Rents

According to a former Capitol Hill business owner, “it is incredibly difficult for small retail to be successful – rent for retail space on Capitol Hill is astronomical.”  A real estate broker told CHC rents can range from $30 to $80 per square foot, depending on the buildout.

Triple Net leases

According to a former small business owner, many commercial retail outlets on Capitol Hill have what is known as “triple net leases” – “so that’s really, really scary for a small business.”

Triple net means that a lessee not only pays base rent but also pays property taxes, insurance and upkeep for the building – property owners don’t pay anything.  Potential tenants may know their base rent but have no idea what annual costs of maintenance or property taxes will be. 

A small locally owned retail outlet like the former Radicci related their monthly payment was $17,000 a month (which appears to have included triple net).  One locally owned bar on Barracks Row is reportedly paying $25,000 a month in rent and triple net. 

Financing Issues

Many of residents pass by empty storefronts and wonder why the landlord does not respond to the market by lowering rent.  A knowledgeable source says that part of the reason for high rents is financing. A commercial building’s value is directly tied to income from the lease. If a landlord signs a long-term lease at a lower rent, the property’s appraised value drops.  Commercial loans generally come up for renewal every five or ten years so landlords are very reluctant to lower the rent because it’s going to affect the amount for which they can finance their properties.  This could trigger a refinancing and result in out of pocket expenses for the landlord. 

Preference for Restaurants

Landlords often let a building sit empty, waiting for a long lease from a national franchise fast food place – say a tenant like Taco Bell.  Leasing to a local tenant at a lower rent precludes leasing to tenant with deeper pockets.  The former Capitol Hill business owner says:  “I definitely think that has been a problem on Capitol Hill…When I was looking for a place I had multiple landlords tell me that they wanted restaurants to go in which I think is hilarious because most of the restaurants need highly engineered spaces.” 

City Obstacles

Many current, prospective, and former tenants agree that the city’s permitting process is too burdensome, especially when compared other jurisdictions.  The former business owner says “it’s very difficult to find out what you need to do to open and every time you talk to somebody they will tell you something different.”

Michael Warner, co-owner of DCanter with his wife Michelle, who recently opened an outlet in Old Town Alexandria, says that “the regulations in Virginia and DC are not that different – what is different is the ease of complying with regulations in Virginia.  Within one or two phone calls you are on the phone with the person who can help you walk through the X, Y and Z that needs to be accomplished to get that permit.  In DC by comparison it tends to be a bit of a rabbit hole and you spend a lot of time and a lot of effort trying to get through to the right people.”

*Some current and former brick and mortar include apparel stores (the former Bitter Grace), gift shops (Groovy’s and the former Monkey’s Uncle), second-hand dealers (Clothes Encounters), book shops (Capitol Hill Books), artisanal goods (the former Fridge and the former Homebody), antique shops (the former Capitol Hill Antiques and the former Found on the Hill), and consignment boutiques (Clothes Encounters), specialty food shops (the former Souk and the former Mason & Greens ), barber shops (Ja-Jo’s), hair stylists (Blackbird), florists (the former Ophelia’s), hardware stores (the former 8th Street Hardware), leather goods, (the former Quavaro), and custom furniture (the former Septcarres).

Next:  Retail on Capitol Hill Part II

8 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

The Week Ahead…& Some Photos from the Past Week

The Week Ahead…& Some Photos from the Past Week

by Larry Janezich

Posted January 25, 2026

Trader Joe’s bread cases at 3:00pm on Friday afternoon. 

The Second Address Restaurant opens at 303 Massachusetts Avenue, NE (To see their story and the menu, go here:  https://www.secondaddressdc.com/ ): 

As you enter.

View of first floor looking out.

One of the two upstairs dining rooms.

Budz – the latest medical weed dispensary to open in ANC6C will open soon at 312 Massachusetts Avenue, NE. 

Garfield Park – DDOT Phase 2 construction of the Garfield Park-Canal Park Connector Project, which includes the space beneath the freeway connecting the two parks is scheduled to begin (?) Monday, Jan. 26, and is expected to last six to eight weeks.

The Week Ahead…

Monday, January 26

CANCELLED ANC6A Community Outreach Committee meeting CANCELLED

ANC6B Southeast Library Task Force Meeting will hold a virtual meeting at 6:30pm.

For info on how to join the meeting, go here:  https://anc6b.org/  

Among items on the agenda:

  • Appointment of Secretary.
  • Approval of Agenda and Minutes.
  • Renovation Update.
  • Neighbor Issues.
  • Arthur Capper Interim Library.
    • Flyer distribution.
    • Days & hours.

Tuesday, January 27

ANC6A Alcohol Beverage & Cannabis Committee is scheduled to hold a virtual meeting at 7:00pm.

Among items on the draft agenda:  TBA

ANC6B Executive Committee with hold a virtual meeting at 7:00pm.

Agenda:  The agendas for the February ABC, Transportation, and Planning & Zoning Committee meetings will be voted on as will the agenda for the February Full Meeting of ANC 6B.

Wednesday, January 28

ANC6B Public Safety Committee is scheduled to hold a hybrid meeting (in-person and virtual) at 6:30pm. 

The in-person meeting is scheduled at 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE (entrance next to Trader Joe’s), second floor conference room #1. 

Agenda:  TBA

Capitol Hill Corner would also like you to know about events which as of this writing are scheduled for the coming week: 

Go here to see a list of upcoming events for this week and to sign up to join FreeDC:  https://freedcproject.org/

Wednesday, January 28

Hill Center Event

Natan Last, The New Yorker Crossword Contributor, discusses his new book, Across the Universe, in conversation with writer Stefan Fatsis

Wednesday, January 28 | 7:00 pm – 9:00 pm |  $12 | Register here  https://bit.ly/4pZptsn

On-going: 

Explore the Folger on a Guided Tour!

Comments Off on The Week Ahead…& Some Photos from the Past Week

Filed under Uncategorized

First Look at New Design for Rumsey Aquatic Court

First Look at New Design for Rumsey Aquatic Court

by Larry Janezich

Posted January 2, 2026

The first roll out of the city’s proposed design for the new Rumsey Aquatic Center in March of 2025 produced a strong negative community reaction and especially from CM Charles Allen who had specifically found funding for a second floor which was not included in the plans.

Allen launched a petition drive, ANC6B, the Eastern Market Community Advisory Committee and Barracks Row MainStreet sent letters of support for plan modifications on behalf of the community.  Allen announced that in response to the pushback the Department of Parks and Recreation would be coming back to the community with a revised design. 

Just before the end of the year, the concept plans for the new design became available.  DC law requires the Mayor to submit plans to the Historic Preservation Review Board (HPRB) for consideration before construction can begin on property within a historic district. 

The proposed new building will be a destination facility for DPR, serving as a place for competitive swim events, community gatherings, and senior center activities including physical fitness amenities and a maker space.  The project will provide approximately 29,000 square feet (up from 20,584) across two levels and will include the program elements outlined below.

Here are the concept renderings being submitted to HPRB – preliminary 3D visualizations showing the basic form, massing, and spatial ideas of the early-stage design. 

Birds eye view of existing building.

Birds eye view of new building.

First Floor Plan.

Proposed Programming Summary for First Floor:

  • Full size 8-lane lap swimming pool.
  • A smaller therapy pool.
  • Locker rooms, a family changing room, and bathrooms adjacent to the pools and splash   pad.
  • Staff office.
  • Tech lounge.
  • First aid room.
  • Life Guard room.
  • Lobby.
  • Storage.

Second Floor Plan.

Proposed Programming Summary for Second Floor.

  • Large Multipurpose/Recreation Room.
  • Senior center with tech lounge, and other amenities.
  • Small Fitness Room.
  • Meeting rooms.
  • Conference room.
  • Incubator / Maker Space.
  • Pool-overlook space.
  • Terrace overlooking North Carolina Avenue.
  • Toilets.
  • Storage.

View of Main Entrance from northeast Corner of the building.

View of the south side of the building from C Street.

View of the southeast corner and the Eastern Market Alley from C Street.

Here’s a link to the December 19, 2025 DPR Rumsey Aquatic Center – HPO Filing Package:  https://app.box.com/s/dhn9muwq7e6fqor5v5v40hn1w7yanfma/file/2084894430314

Next:  Expect DPR is likely to announce a community meeting to present the new plan to stakeholders.  The project team will continue to provide regular updates to a broad range of community stakeholders associated with the project, including Councilmember Charles Allen and his staff, ANC6B, Eastern Market Community Advisory Committee, the Capitol Hill Restoration Society, and the DC Preservation League.  This will include on-going revisions to the plan up to and including final photo realistic renderings. 

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Photo Essay: Wreaths Across America at Congressional Cemetery Honors Veterans

Photo Essay: Wreaths Across America at Congressional Cemetery Honors Veterans

by Larry Janezich

Posted December 15, 2025

It was cold Saturday morning, but some 200 community members turned out to pay tribute to the 1700 plus veterans – some dating to the Revolutionary War – interred at Congressional Cemetery.  The volunteers also served to place wreaths purchased by the community through donations to Wreaths Across America on the graves of veterans whose remains are buried here. 

The Presentation of Colors by members of the DC National Guard.

SGT Vicky Golding (vocalist) sings The National Anthem.

Mark Hudson, Executive Director of Congressional Cemetery, reminded those attending that at its core, Congressional Cemetery is a historic and active burial ground “and all of our efforts support the mission to preserve and protect these hallowed grounds while we respectfully celebrate the lives of those whose remains lie in eternal rest here.”

Hudson’s remarks were followed by Colonel Vincent A. Cummings, Command Chaplain for DC National Guard who stood in as keynote speaker for DC National Guard Commander Brigadier General Leland Blanchard II.  In his remarks, he said, “Our support of Wreaths Across American reinforces the unique role the National Guard plays in our community.  We’re part of the society we serve and those relationships build trust, strengthen connections, and ensure we remain ready and always there for the people of DC….

Congressional Cemetery’s Program Director A.J. Orlokoff called each service to step forward and place a commutative wreath to those assembled.

Volunteers receive wreaths to place on graves.

A member of the National Guard speaks the name and salutes the memory of a veteran after placing the wreath. 

Wreaths Across America is a nonprofit founded to continue and expand the annual wreath laying at Arlington as well as at thousands of veterans’ cemeteries and across the country and abroad.

Comments Off on Photo Essay: Wreaths Across America at Congressional Cemetery Honors Veterans

Filed under Uncategorized

Update on Spotify’s Purchase of 440 New Jersey Avenue, SE

440 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Update on Spotify’s Purchase of 440 New Jersey Avenue, SE

by Larry Janezich

Posted November 19, 2025

Last week, ANC6B discussed the Historic Preservation Application by the $137 billion Spotify Corporation (headquartered in Stockholm but operating in the US through one of its subsidiaries, Spotify USA).  The company recently purchased the residence at 440 New Jersey Avenue, SE, along with the adjoining garage/carriage house at 435 1st St SE.  The company plans to renovate the property.

According to ANC6B Planning and Zoning Committee Chair Vince Marino, “…the renovations themselves are minor and clearly designed to respect the property’s history, so no one on the ANC objects to them as such.”

Some members of the Committee, however, are concerned about Spotify’s claim that it does not need an exemption from zoning regulations for the residential property, because they fear Spotify will use the property for commercial purposes at the expense of the residential fabric of the neighborhood – as has happened with other residential properties on the block. 

Marino says, “One may suspect that Spotify might succumb to the temptation to use the home as an employee hotel, or as a lobbying office.  Spotify denies that it will.  But that’s certainly what we seem to be seeing with many other Capitol Hill homes owned by corporations and advocacy groups. … We need to have a neighborhood-wide conversation about whether more areas should be upzoned for mixed use and/or higher density.

ANC6B went on to unanimously approve a proposal to designate ANC6B Commissioner Tyler Wolanin – in whose single member district 440 New Jersey is located – to attempt to reach a settlement agreement with Spotify. 

Marino says, “We hope that such a settlement agreement would confirm that Spotify will indeed use 440 New Jersey Avenue SE as a residence rather than as a hotel or office.  This would provide Spotify with the reassurance that we are not trying to evict them, and it would provide the neighbors with the reassurance that ANC6B is trying to contain the situation, one home at a time, while the BZA and the City Council work on a broader solution to the tight property market.”

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Neighbors Voice Discontent with Sherwood Rec Center

by Larry Janezich

Posted November 14, 2025

Sherwood Recreation Center at 640 10th Street, NE 

Last night, ANC6A heard the results of a survey conducted by ANC6A03 Commissioner Roberta Shapiro on neighbor’s use of the Sherwood Recreation Center.  She told commissioners that she probably gets more email from her constituents on Sherwood than any other topic, save parking.   Sherwood lies in Shapiro’s single member district. 

Shapiro said, “I’ve done my share of complaining up and down the food chain about the situation there but decided that we really needed more data to back up the complaints.”  So she conducted a survey and received 289 responses from nearby households comprising some 900 residents – 90% within a mile of Sherwood and 71% within a half mile.  She told the ANC that these responses are from people who have an opportunity to use Sherwood, but about 2/3 had never used the inside facility.

The main answers given to the question of why not, included lack of awareness, lack of cleanliness and maintenance, and concerns about safety.  The outdoor facilities – the playground, the tennis court, the basketball court, and the field running track were more broadly used.   

The survey showed that more than half of respondents said they get no communication from the Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) about the facilities.  And reacting to information provided about Sherwood programs, only 14% of the respondents said that programming choices were good.  Also, only 23% rated the equipment as good, and only 25% rated maintenance and cleanliness good.

Shapiro said that people have a fairly negative view of the facility, but there was “very strong interest in having expanded programming for little kids, preschoolers, and adult exercise programs.”

When asked what additional facilities people wanted, Shapiro said there was “a whole range of answers but 50% of respondents said they’d like to see a kid’s splash park like the one at Eastern Market Metro Park and 25% said they were interested in community gardens.”

There were 88 responses in which people took the time to write narrative answers to the question whether there was anything else they’d like to comment on or suggest. The number one topic was poor cleanliness and maintenance, number two was loitering, gambling, alcohol and drug consumption on the north side of the building. Those were followed by the need for more programming and expanded hours – people complained about being there with their kids on a Sunday and there’s no access to a bathroom facility.  (CM Charles Allen has legislation pending before the City Council to expand hours at DC Recreation Facilities, requiring minimum weekend hours and increased weekday hours.)  Also mentioned was the need for improvements in fixing equipment, ventilation, and cleaning.

Shapiro said, … ”there are other DPR facilities which are in really good shape and offer extensive programming and I don’t quite understand why Sherwood is the stepchild of the system.”

She referenced $4 million in the DC FY26 capital budget for improvements at Sherwood and said there needs to be a real effort to engage the community in terms of how those dollars get spent, and added that DPR says they are behind schedule but pledged community engagement. 

With respect to nest steps, Shapiro said she had shared the survey with CM Charles Allen’s office and DPR.  She said “we have written multiple times to Director Thennie Freeman (DPR) and we did not even get the courtesy of a response.  So I think we just all need to keep making noise.  I guess we could send another letter and copy the council and copy Director Freeman and copy DGS Director Hunter as well but I sort of feel like we are whistling into the wind.” 

Commissioner and former ANC6A Chair Amber Gove suggested a next step could be drafting testimony for thecouncil’s performance oversight hearing.  She added, “I would say that I very much recognize whenever I venture into NW that there is a huge difference in the quality of our facilities managed by DPR, and it would be wonderful if attention could be drawn to that … I don’t know if you recall but a couple years ago when this topic came up and in a letter to Director Freeman we actually did a comparison programming at all of the other DPR facilities … and Sherwood was at the bottom of the barrel in terms of … programming offered.”

Gove went on, “I think a conversation … identifying some of the discrepancies and showing them just what we’re seeing as commissioners, not just in our areas but in Ward 7 and 8, that the quality of facilities can be quite different than they are in the other parts of the city.

Comments Off on Neighbors Voice Discontent with Sherwood Rec Center

Filed under Uncategorized

Office of DC Attorney General Under Seige, AG Schwalb Tells ANC Committee

L-R, DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb; Commissioner Brian Gorman, Chair, ANC6B Public Safety Committee; Commissioner Sam Pastore. 

Office of DC Attorney General Under Seige, AG Schwalb Tells ANC Committee

by Larry Janezich

Posted October 28, 2025

DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb attended ANC6B’s Public Safety Committee meeting Monday night.  He summarized what his office does for the city:  serving as its law firm, serving as a public advocate defending and protecting the public interest, and protecting public safety – which he said was broader than prosecuting crime.

He defended the independence of the Attorney General’s Office noting that “our Mayor has never been a fan of an independent Attorney General” but it’s a necessary check on executive power.  Currently, he said, his office was very much under siege and an attack from the federal government.  For example, after filing lawsuits against the federal government for taking over the MPD and deploying out-of-state National Guard in the city, Schwalb said a member of congress introduced a bill – in collaboration with the White House – to change the independent elected DC attorney general to a presidential appointed attorney general with no Senate confirmation.  The proposed law would make the attorney general accountable to the President – which allows for the office to be weaponized.  The bill has passed the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and will come up on the House floor at the discretion of the Speaker of the House.

He cited another bill which reflects the administration’s hostility to the District – supposedly in the interest of public safety which Schwalb termed a “ruse” used to attack home rule – the Judicial Nominations Reform Act which would abolish the District’s Judicial Nomination Commission which currently vets and recommends candidates for DC’s local courts.  The bill would shift shift this power to the President with confirmation by the Senate.

He also pointed to the House of Representatives’ passage of the Juvenile Sentencing Reform Act that would – at the discretion of the US Attorney General – lower the age from 16 to 14 for prosecution of District juveniles as adults for some violent crimes, including murder, first-degree sexual assault, first-degree burglary, and robbery while armed or assault with intent to commit any of these offenses.

Schwalb criticized the District’s bifurcated criminal justice system which provides for the prosecution of adults by the District’s US Attorney and juveniles by the DC Attorney General.  He says we need a local prosecutor accountable to the people of the District.

He said that there are 16 bills* before Congress that would change the way home rule operates in the District and debate on all of them is on-going.  He urged residents to support home rule. 

Appearing under a time constraint, Schwalb took several questions from members of the public and the Public Safety Committee.  On the issue of enforcement against reckless moped drivers, he offered criminal prosecution where warranted and a potential investigation of the questionable operation of problematic third party providers – neither suggestion provided much satisfaction to the father of a child who had received a concussion from a recklessly operated food delivery moped.  (See CHC post here:  http://bit.ly/3WtcTW0 )  Similarly, he could not offer much insight with respect to a question about the performance of Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services owing to the “difficulty in measuring recidivism,” or much hope with respect to a question of progress on renovating the DC Jail, noting “it’s in our interest to get jail repaired – but not easy with tight dollars.”

*In addition to the bills affecting home rule mentioned by Schwalb, some of the other 16 bills pending in Congress which would affect DC home rule include:

  • Repeal of policing legislation: Overturns police reform legislation the D.C. Council passed after the murder of George Floyd.
  • D.C. Policing Protection Act: Expands the circumstances under which police officers are allowed to engage in vehicular pursuits.
  • Amendments to the Youth Rehabilitation Amendment Act:  Would eliminate judicial discretion to sentence eligible youth offenders below a mandatory minimum and restrict youth offender status for individuals convicted of certain crimes. 
  • Repeal of the Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act: Nullifies a D.C. law that allows juveniles to petition for early release after serving 15 years.
  • Bail system overhaul: Requires pretrial detention for anyone charged with a “violent or dangerous offense,” including some felony drug charges, and brings back the use of cash bail for certain crimes.
  • Criminalizing homelessness: Makes it illegal to sleep in public places, including in a car.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Update on ANC6B and National Guard Beautification

Update on ANC6B and National Guard Beautification

by Larry Janezich

Posted October 17, 2025

Marcus Hunt, Office of the Deputy Mayor’s Director of DC Government Operations for the DC National Guard, makes a presentation to ANC6B.  Hunt has been billed in local media as “Director of the National Guard.” 

Wednesday night, at its hybrid October meeting, ANC6B re-affirmed its decision not to place a discussion of the National Guard on the meeting’s agenda.  The genesis of the proposed discussion was an offer from the Guard – via Marcus Hunt, DC’s liaison to the Guard – to help with beautification projects in ANC commissioners’ single member districts.  The offer was sent to individual ANC commissioners across the city.  Some commissioners suggested that since Hunt’s offer was sent to individual commissioners, the decision should be left to them, and as such, there was no role for the ANC in this matter. 

Commissioner David Sobelsohn continued to push to hear from two individuals on the subject. First, from Marcus Hunt, who was billed as the Director of the National Guard, but who is actually an employee of the Office of the Deputy Director of Public Safety.  He is the city’s liaison with the National Guard on the issue of beautification efforts.  And while he is also a Lt. Col. in the National Guard he did not appear in uniform and is currently not acting “under orders.”  Second, from ANC2G01 Commissioner Howard Garrett who authored a letter opposing Commissioners accepting the offer for the Guard to assist in beautification projects because that would “normalize” the Guard for tasks that belong to civilian agencies. 

It is routine for the commission to provide a period for “Community Announcements” and it was the consensus of the commission that Hunt and Garrett could use this time to discuss the National Guard.  Comments are usually limited to three minutes, but the Commission agreed to a motion to allow discussion at the beginning of the period and then subsequently set a time limit of 20 minutes. 

As it turned out, the discussion lasted some 40 minutes, but produced little clarification on beautification possibilities as Hunt discussed his background, history of the Guards and its relation to DC, his job with the Deputy Mayor’s Office and some of the beautification activities the Guard has undertaken.  He referred questions regarding the safety activities of the Guard to Master Sergeant Arthur Wright (who was not present), saying he could only speak at tonight’s meeting to talk about beautification.

During the Q&A, the meeting turned confrontational as some of the dozen community members attending in-person challenged the legitimacy of the deployment of the National Guard on DC streets – a subject on which Hunt could not comment.  One member of the audience expressed his appreciation for the Guard’s presence in the community.  Afterward, Commissioner Howard Garrett, appearing on-line, read a prepared statement reiterating the points of his letter (which many ANC Commissioners have signed) opposing requesting assistance for beautification efforts. 

Following the discussion, Sobelsohn proposed two more motions.  The first asked the ANC’s Public Safety Committee to make a recommendation about what commissioners should do regarding the Guard’s offer to help with beautification projects.  When that motion failed for lack of a second, the second motion asked for a recommendation from the ANC’s Parks and Public Spaces Task Force.  That motion also failed for a lack of second. 

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

National Guard Director’s Q&A with ANC6C 

ANC6C meeting on October 8, 2025. National Guard Director Lt. Col. Marcus Hunt is at center. Chair Karen Wirt is top, center.

National Guard Director’s Q&A with ANC6C 

by Larry Janezich

Posted October 9, 2025

National Guard Official’s Q&A with ANC6C 

Wednesday night, ANC6C heard a short on-line presentation from Lt. Col. Marcus Hunt, DC National Guard Director of Government Operations, on how the National Guard connects to the DC community.  The occasion was the ANC’s October meeting, conducted virtually and chaired by Commissioner Karen Wirt. 

Hunt is the liaison between the Guard’s commander – Brigadier General Leland Blanchard – and Lindsey Appiah, DC Deputy Mayor of Public Safety and Justice.     

In a 20 minute session ANC commissioners Hunt stressed the home-grown character of the National Guard, presenting them as neighbors who like himself live in the community.  Commissioners heard how the Guard’s beautification program works, asked questions about what kinds of beautification assistance the Guard could provide and expressed concerns about the Guard’s role as a military presence in the city. 

Hunt explained the current mission ordered by the President on August 11, has two components: Task Force Safe and Task Force Beautification.  He said he was at the ANC meeting to discuss Task Force Beautification and that any questions on Task Force Safe should be submitted to National Guard Master Sergeant Arthur Wright, whose email he provided. 

He said Task Force Beautification has three components:  resilience, opportunity, and community and each of these components has two subsets:  food/housing, youth/jobs, and help/safe and public spaces.  He spent considerable time on the youth/jobs component and the Guard’s efforts to provide opportunities for and mentoring of at risk youth. 

With respect to the help/safe and public spaces subset, in September Hunt had sent an email to all ANC commissioners in the city asking about neighborhood beautification projects and offering assistance.

On Wednesday night, Hunt emphasized that community requests for assistance must be filtered through ANC Commissioners (but apparently not through the full ANCs).  Upon receipt of the request by his office it undergoes an assessment regarding whether it is  something the National Guard can support. 

Commissioner Jeremiah Foxwell began the short Q&A by asking about the limits of what the Guard could do, specifically if that would include acting as crossing guards on H Street to provide an element of safety for school children crossing H Street NE.  Commissioner Daniela McInerney added to Foxwell’s question expressing resident’s concerns about armed National Guard in battle gear noting that “we have had the National Guard patrolling the streets around Ludlow Taylor Elementary School without the community being notified.” 

Hunt replied that he wasn’t trying to deflect the question about patrolling streets but said that any question relating to Task Force Safe should be directed to Master Sergeant Wright.  He added that what he could say regarding not notifying the community of a mission operation is that a lot of those are just not shared publicly for operational safety purposes.

Rather than giving Foxwell a specific response to the crossing guard question, Hunt said that “once I receive an email from an ANC commissioner inviting Task Force Beautification into the community to serve side by side with community members – that’s where we kind of lean forward – to go through our process to partner with the community.”  

Just how “partner with the community” is defined is somewhat uncertain, but it implies personal interaction.  Though not explicitly stated this appears to mean working alongside community members (for example in cleanup and other projects) which allow the Guard to engage directly with community. 

Hunt added, “We have been very successful in the safe public spaces subset in responding to invitations from the ANC commissioners…a half dozen Ward 8 commissioners have invited us out…we have an event in Ward 4 this Saturday at Fort Stevens Park…we also have a bit upcoming with Ward 5 to do some community clean up and partnership.”

Commissioner Andrew Hayes addressed the resentment of the presence of the Guard on city streets felt by many residents.   He acknowledged that some of the Guard are neighbors…“but at the same time I think it is unacceptable and not appropriate for our streets to be policed by people in military gear and I would really appreciate if you could take the message back that we would only be open – at least I personally would only be able to support assistance from the current beautification if those folks can work in (civilian attire)….”   

Hunt replied that if an ANC Commissioner sends an invitation with requirements regarding – for example – community clean up in civilian clothes, “I believe that’s doable.”

It appeared that Hunt had limited his availability to 20 minutes, and Chair Wirt thanked him for appearing.  He may not have still been online in the virtual meeting when former ANC6A Commissioner Drew Courtney summed up his own feelings which likely crystallized the mixed feelings many have about neighbors who are Guard members, Guard members sent from other parts of the country and the other federal law enforcement officers deployed in DC. 

Courtney said, “I am so grateful for the service of our neighbors in the National Guard and I think one of the saddest things about these recent months has been the way that the politicization of the Guard has undermined some really good efforts.  But I don’t think there’s any way right now that we can expect constituents to separate what we’re seeing from Guards who have been sent in against the will of our limited representatives from Ohio and South Carolina and from West Virginia, and the fact that this is so closely associated … with the raids that are really unconscionable being conducted by ICE…. I think we all underscore our gratitude for our neighbors in uniform but the respect for that uniform has been undermined by the political actions that have been taken by the president in this community and I think we have to recognize that.”

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized