Author Archives: ljjanezich

Taskforce Begins Work on Redesign of Eastern Market Metro Plaza

The North Parcel of the Eastern Market Plaza Complex Will Be Re-Designed to Encompass a Playground

The North Parcel of the Eastern Market Plaza Complex Will Be Re-Designed to Encompass a New Playground

How to Deal with the Community's Homeless Who Currently Frequent the Plaza and Nearby   Spaces Protected From the Elements Constitutes One of Several Issues Facing Planners

Taskforce Begins Work on Redesign of Eastern Market Metro Plaza

by Larry Janezich

Last Wednesday, the “Taskforce on Eastern Market Metro Park” met at Hill Center to receive a presentation from the Market Plaza design team, led by Amy Weinstein of Escoff & Associates Architects.  The discussion was guided by Barracks Row Main Street (BRMS) Board Vice-Chairman, David Perry.

The convening authority of the Taskforce is BRMS, and the Taskforce is composed residents, groups, and businesses who Councilmember Tommy Wells referred to as the “front row stakeholders” to the redesign process.  A complete list of the Taskforce membership is not yet available to the public.

According to the design firm charged with the project, the goals of the redesign are to beautify it, and to increase its functionality as a connector between the 7th Street Eastern Market commercial corridor and the Barrack’s Row, 8th Street south of the freeway, and the M Street commercial corridor.  The firm also cites the goal of developing a portion of the parcel on the north side of Pennsylvania Avenue into a playground funded in part by a $50,000 grant from Stanton EastBanc (SEB) as part of the community benefits conceded by the developers as part of the Zoning Commission’s Planned Unit Development (PUD) process.

Escoff & Associates was awarded the $500,000 contract for the study in April, via funds earmarked by the US Congress; by law, this money had to be expended by the end of September 2013.  Another $1 million in earmarked funds remains to implement the design changes, though it is certain that additional monies will need to be sought from city or federal sources.

By Wednesday night, the design team had compiled and grouped a list of community comments gathered from the Eastern Market Metro Park website, from community meetings, and from a suggestion box located in the North Hall of Eastern Market until August 7, 2013.  The Taskforce advising the design team had only a few minutes to look over the compiled comments and a diagram of existing conditions.  These materials are expected to be available on the Eastern Market Metro Park website at www.easternmarkemetropark.org during the coming week, as is a Taskforce roster.

By the end of the 90 minute meeting, a rough consensus on priorities seemed to emerge, with the focus being on the following main points:

Maintain and improve multi-modality transportation features

Improve orientation and make the Plaza a functioning portal

Create an interactive space

Provide a design for evening use of space

Create a place for relaxation, socializing and gathering

Plaza should be utilitarian rather than commerce-oriented

It should be a muti-generational space

The façade of the South East Library should be integrated into the plan

Weinstein asserted that the plans for the redesign already addressed several community concerns including environmental sustainability, pedestrian safety, and on-going maintenance of the park.

The Design Team – specifically Amy Weinstein, Ohme vas Sweeden Landscape Architects, and Kittleson & Associates traffic and transportation consultants – will come back at the end of September to present two alternative concepts to the Taskforce for discussion.  Input from the Task Force meeting will be incorporated into the two concepts which will subsequently be presented to a community-wide forum for community input.  The Taskforce will then select the “final” design concept.  Further consideration will then be given to details concerning the north parcel and the playground.

One option that will not be considered is the possible rerouting of Pennsylvania Avenue.  The issue was raised by a member of the Taskforce, but Perry noted that it was “off the table” having been rejected by the community when considered during a 2010 effort to redesign the Plaza.

An issue which the group tiptoed around was the use of some of the four parts of the plaza as a gathering place for those who seem to be indigent, in need of services, homeless, or some combination of all of these.  Community Connections, the city’s largest private contractor of mental health services, was not present at the Taskforce meeting, even though some of its offices sit directly adjacent to a portion of the plaza.  While it is unclear whether the group has been invited to participate, Amy Weinstein reported portions of a conversation with Joe Cullen, Director of Operations for Community Connections.  According to Weinstein, Cullen is aware of the activities of CC’s clients in the community.  She said that according to Cullen, “some of the clients (specifically those suffering from schizophrenia who talk to themselves) go to the north parcel to avoid the stares of passersby; other clients go to the Metro Plaza which is financially rewarding.”

One Taskforce member expressed concerns about the “camp site” for the homeless that had developed on the north parcel between PA Avenue and D Street.

In response, David Perry of BRMS, cited a study which he said shows that with an “increase in activity level, the problems we’re alluding to will disappear – some of the more problematic issues are inimical to large numbers of people.”  It is clear that these issues will continue to be raised, but it is equally clear that no known member of the Taskforce has the competence or expertise to speak authoritatively about them.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Capitol Hill Residents Appeal to Wells on Hine Project – Court of Appeals Sets Hearing Date

Hine Sign

Capitol Hill Residents Appeal to Wells on Hine Project

Court of Appeals Sets Hearing Date

by Larry Janezich

A group of Capitol Hill residents who are appealing the decision of the Zoning Commission on the Hine project has written to Councilmember Wells to urge him to support their efforts for reconsideration of the PUD order by the Commission.  A copy of the letter to Wells is below.

Oral argument before the DC Court of Appeals on the resident’s appeal has been scheduled for September 26th at 9:30am in Courtroom 1 of the DC Court of Appeals, 430 E Street, NW.

August 9, 2013

VIA EMAIL AND FIRST CLASS MAIL

Councilmember Tommy Wells

Council of the District of Columbia

1350 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 402

Washington, DC 20004

Dear Councilmember Wells:

We are a group of Ward 6 residents who write in response to your recently stated support for the Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) that the developer Stanton-EastBanc, LLC proposes to build on public property where the former Hine Junior High School is located.  We have serious concerns about several aspects of this deal, not least of which is the lack of transparency regarding its basic terms.  Many people have no idea, for example, that the District will convey ownership or control of this valuable public property to Stanton-EastBanc at a sharply discounted price, or that District taxpayers will pay for many of the “public benefits” Stanton-EastBanc claims its PUD will provide.  The PUD also appears to violate key provisions of the District’s zoning regulations and Comprehensive Plan, which are intended to ensure that new developments are compatible with existing neighborhoods, and that the District remains affordable to all residents – not just the wealthy.

Because the PUD will be located in the heart of the Capitol Hill Historic District, we are particularly concerned about its excessive size and height, and the negative impact it will have on the historic character of our community.  The PUD will top out at seven stories and 94.5 feet – more than twice the height of the historic rowhouses and other buildings surrounding it – and will tower over everything in the vicinity.  Remarkably, however, the Zoning Commission approved Stanton-EastBanc’s PUD without even addressing this extreme disparity in height, despite the Comprehensive Plan’s express requirement that developments in historic districts “shall be consistent with the height and density of contributing buildings in the district.” 10 DCMR § 1011.11. We are therefore raising our concerns in an appeal to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

The Court has not yet decided whether the PUD complies with District of Columbia law, but the Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development (“DMPED”) is nevertheless pressing ahead in its deal with Stanton-EastBanc.  In July, DMPED reportedly transferred the Hine School property to Stanton-EastBanc by means of a hastily-executed lease and sale agreement that was not subject to public review.  As your constituents, hundreds of whom wrote letters or signed petitions in opposition to this ill-conceived PUD, we therefore ask that you reconsider your support for it, based on the following:

(The facts included herein may be verified by reference to materials in the public record of Proposed Resolution 18-963, the “Hine Junior High School Disposition Approval Resolution of 2010,” which are available online through the Council’s Legislative Information Management System.)

1. The 2010 tax-assessed value of the Hine School property was $44,672,920, but DMPED agreed to sell the “North Parcel” to Stanton-EastBanc for only $800,000, and granted the “South Parcel” to Stanton-EastBanc under a 99-year lease for only $21 million – a sharp discount even before the Zoning Commission upzoned the property to allow Stanton-EastBanc’s PUD to be more than twice the height and density currently allowed;

2. District taxpayers – not Stanton-EastBanc – will pay for demolition of the Hine School, including asbestos abatement and other environmental remediation, and for construction of the 700 block of C Street, even though Stanton-EastBanc will own this formerly public street;

3. Because the PUD has been exempted from the Inclusionary Zoning regulations, District taxpayers also will pay for the affordable housing units in the PUD, which Stanton-EastBanc otherwise would be required by law to provide, see 11 DCMR § 2600 et seq.;

4. The affordable housing units, most of which are intended for District seniors, will expire after 40 years, in violation of the requirement that they be set aside “for so long as the project exists,” 11 DCMR § 2602.7(b), and the Comprehensive Plan policy of increasing the amount of affordable housing for “current and future residents,” 11 DCMR § 2600.1 (emphasis added);

5. The affordable housing units will be significantly smaller than the market rate units, and will be segregated in the North Building, without access to the “luxury” amenities in the South Building, in violation of the Inclusionary Zoning regulations’ purpose of “ensuring the benefits of economic integration for the residents of the District,” 11 DCMR §2600.3(e), as well as Comprehensive Plan policies intended to promote an “inclusive city,” 10 DCMR §§ 100, 500.3, 500.14.

We believe the foregoing facts demonstrate that this oversized PUD will not only cause permanent damage to the unique character of the Capitol Hill Historic District, but also that it represents a gross waste of taxpayer assets.  The District is transferring ownership or control of the Hine School property to Stanton-EastBanc for a fraction of its fair market value, and District taxpayers are further subsidizing the PUD by paying for “public benefits” that Stanton-EastBanc is required by law to provide. Councilmember Wells, we have always supported redevelopment of this property in a reasonable manner that will enhance the Eastern Market neighborhood, rather than destroying the qualities that make it a beloved attraction throughout the District, and for visitors nationwide.  Will you not investigate the foregoing facts, and join us in our effort?   If you still support Stanton-EastBanc’s PUD, however, please respond to this letter by explaining why you believe this seven-story, 94.5-foot PUD is appropriate in an historic district currently zoned for building less than half that height, and why the taxpayer subsidies identified herein are justified. In view of your mayoral candidacy, the voting public deserves to know where you stand on such matters.

We recognize that your position as a Councilmember is a demanding one, but due to the urgency of this matter, we respectfully ask that you respond to this letter within two weeks, by August 23, 2013. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Petitioners, Howell, et al. v. D.C. Zoning

Comm’n., No. 11-AA-366-378

6 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Franks Place – Photo Essay

FRANKS PLACE

FRANKS PLACE

Frank Setting Up

Frank Setting Up

Hats, T-Shirts, Sunglasses

Hats, T-Shirts, Sunglasses

Making a Sale

Making a Sale

"Another Level - The Village is Talkin" features the drumming of Frank Lloyd.  $15 at Franks Place

“Another Level – The Village is Talkin” features the drumming of Frank Lloyd. $15 at Franks Place

Frank Lloyd, Vendor and Percussionist

Frank Lloyd, Vendor and Percussionist

Franks Place

One of the First Capitol Hill Neighborhood Vendors

by Larry Janezich

Frank Lloyd has stationed his business on the corner of 7th and Pennsylvania Avenue, SE, since 1984, selling sunglasses, hats, t-shirts and other merchandise to passersby.  “I first set up on Metro Plaza,” he says, but “they moved me over here.”  “Over here” is the sidewalk next to CVS where he sets up five or six days a week.  He says his best-selling items are sunglasses and t-shirts. 

Lloyd took over the business from his older brother, who moved on to a career in real estate in Raleigh, North Carolina.  Lloyd recalls the early eighties, when there were not many vendors or wholesalers in DC and he had to drive to New York for merchandise every couple of weeks.  “The 80s and 90s,” he says, “were the good old days because of the economy – money was flowing a lot better.”  Lloyd was born in DC and grew up in Barry Farm in Anacostia – a neighborhood named for its origins as part of the farm owned by James Barry in the mid-19th century. 

While vending is Lloyd’s livelihood, drumming is his passion.  Asked to account for his interest in the drums, he recalls the local groups that played in Anacostia Park in the 70s.  Walking back from one of these events, “I saw a guy playing three congas and that inspired me.”  At first self-taught, Lloyd later trained with the Andrew Cacho African Drummers and Dancers, a group founded in the early 70s which taught African Dance and Drumming to youths at Friendship House and later at a location on 8th Street.  After that, Lloyd was mentored by Baba Ngoma – “Father Drum” – a legendary drum master. 

Though he plays professionally only rarely, he has sat in with local jazz artist Wayne Davis.  Lloyd sells a CD at his stand which features his work on conga, bongo, and djembe drums.  Titled, “Another Level. The Village is Talkin,’” the CD is the result of collaboration among local jazz artists Izyez, Aaron J., Lawrence Williams, and Denyse Pearson AKA Lighthouse.  The music featured on the CD is accessible and carefully considered.  The artists use drums, spoken word, vocals, and instrumentals to explore themes of black community, self-sufficiency, spirituality, pride and, most prominently, the importance of history.  “The Village is Talkin’” is priced at $15. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Frager’s Leases Former Restaurant for Paint Outlet – Hopes to Open in Weeks

Former Restaurant at 12th and PA Avenue to reopen as Fragers' Paint Store

Former Restaurant at 12th and PA Avenue to reopen as Fragers’ Paint Stor

Workers Are Clearing the Space to Set Up (Paint) Shop

Workers Are Clearing the Space to Set Up (Paint) Shop

Frager’s Leases Former Restaurant for Paint Outlet – Hopes to Open in Weeks

by Larry Janezich

The former il Capo de Capitol Hill (and before that, Mi Vecindad) has been leased by Fragers’ to temporarily house their paint store – reportedly, the most profitable of the hardware store’s diverse operations.  The building, at 12th and Pennsylvania Avenue, SE, anchors the east end of the block where the original Frager’s store is.  On Wednesday, workmen were clearing the site in anticipation of stocking and opening – possibly in as few as three weeks.

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Attorney’s Letter to DMPED on Lack of Hine Transparency-LDDA FOIA Posted

Attorney’s Letter to DMPED on Lack of Hine Transparency Posted

by Larry Janezich

Attorney Oliver Hall’s letter protesting the lack of transparency on the Hine transfer and formally filing a FOIA for the Hine Land Disposition and Development Agreement (LDDA) is now posted in the Library at the top of this page.

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

18th Amendment Bought Out by Owners of Capitol Hill’s Bar 201/Union Pub

The 18th Amendment

The 18th Amendment

18th Amendment Bought Out by Owners of Bar 201/Union Pub

by Larry Janezich

The partnership which owns Bar 201/Union Pub at 201 Massachusetts Avenue, NE are the new owners of the former 18th Amendment at 613 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE.  The 18th Amendment, which has operated as a bar and restaurant for more than seven years, closed last Saturday.  Brad Ingwell, the operating partner at Bar 201 said that he had no comment on future plans for the venue that will replace the 18th Amendment, but hoped that the new place could open this year.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Hine Update: Attorney Oliver Hall Files FOIA for Details of Hine Disposition

Hine Update:  Attorney Oliver Hall Files FOIA for Details of Hine Disposition

EastBanc Applies for Raze Permit from Historic Preservation Office

by Larry Janezich

Oliver Hall, the attorney for the group of Capitol Hill residents who are appealing the decision of the Zoning Commission on the Hine development, last week filed a FOIA with the office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development (DMPED) to determine the final details concerning the transfer of the Hine site to developers Stanton-EastBanc (SEB).  A copy of the letter – which takes DMPED to task for its lack of transparency on the transfer of the property to the developer – will be posted on Capitol Hill Corner later this week.    

The details of the deal are specified in the Land Disposition and Development Agreement (LDDA), which among other things reveals the degree to which district taxpayers are subsidizing the Hine project.  The subsidy comes in the form of a discounted price for the prime building site compared to the actual market value of the site. 

The draft version of the LDDA dated June 10, 2010, shows a substantial subsidy for the developers – the difference between the LDDA value of the property at $50 a square foot and the market value of close to $300 a square foot.  It is unclear what changes – if any – were made in the final version of the LDDA, which has not been made public.  Capitol Hill Corner asked DMPED Hine Project Manager Corey Lee if the final LDDA and the conveyance agreement signed on July 12 are public, and if not, when they would be.  Mr. Lee did not respond to the email requests.

A recent five part WAMU/NPR investigative series on the relationship between campaign contributions by private developers and the awarding of taxpayer-subsidized DC real estate deals states that the SEB team contributed $194,045 to DC political campaigns and subsequently was granted the $44.7 million Hine site for $21.8 million – an apparent $22.9 million subsidy.  The figures are from the second part of the WAMU series titled “Deals for Developers” and can be found here:  http://apps.npr.org/deals-for-developers-wamu/

The signing of the lease for the main parcel and sale of the affordable housing portion of the Hine site, officials say, will allow the developer to move forward with the project.  Since, financing for the mixed use project will likely be delayed until the resolution of the appeal of the Zoning Commission’s decision to the District Court of Appeals, transfer of the property will allow the developer to proceed with the asbestos abatement part of the demolition process.  That abatement was originally scheduled to begin in early July.  It is unclear whether actual demolition will begin before the court appeal is decided.  A court hearing on the appeal has been scheduled for mid-September. 

On July 25, the Historic Preservation Office/Office of Planning released the HPO Raze Report with copies of recently filed Raze Permit Applications.  The report reveals that on July 1, 2013, Matthew Harris, who lists his email address and address of the company filing the request as EastBanc’s, filed a Raze Permit Application for 335 8th Street, SE, the Hine site.  Raze permit applications recently submitted to the Historic Preservation Office for administrative clearances are filed on the HPO website at the following abbreviated URL: http://tinyurl.com/3erfa7y

 under “Related Documents”.  HPO provides this general public announcement because of the frequent neighborhood interest in raze applications.

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Barracks Row Pizza Boli’s Reopens – Details on Conditions Forcing Closure

Barracks Row Pizza Boli’s Reopens – Details on Conditions Forcing Closure

by Larry Janezich

Last Wednesday, July 17, the DC Department of Health Food Safety Division investigated complaints regarding Barracks Row’s Pizza Boli’s and cited the carryout for “evidence of rodent infestation, unclean refrigeration equipment, no hot water, outer openings of the establishment unprotected, and outdoor trash storage violations,” according to the investigator who did the inspection.  The inspection report notes five critical violations and 24 non-critical violations which warranted a closure and a summary suspension was issued. 

Some of the most serious violations detailed in the report include the following:

Rodent droppings

Live and dead roaches

Openings in the ceiling and back wall permitting access to the deli by rodents and insects

Food storage on the floor

“Filthy” pizza prep refrigerator

No hot water in kitchen

And: 

“Some of the outdoor trash receptacles are missing their lids while the other outdoor trash receptacles have lids but are not closed.” 

“Two bags of trash are stored on the ground in the outdoor trash storage enclosure.” 

“Numerous outdoor trash storage receptacles are overfilled. A foul odor is emanating for the outdoor trash storage enclosure and food debris is littering the ground inside and outside the closure.”  

According to Jacqueline Coleman, Supervisory Sanitarian at DC Department of Health, the procedure for reopening Pizza Boli’s required a request from the owner for re-inspection after the violations had been corrected.  If the carryout subsequently passes a re-inspection, the business license  is restored  and the  facility permitted  to reopen. 

On Friday, July 19, re-inspection was conducted and the carryout passed its inspection. The delicatessen license was restored and Pizza Boli’s  is now open for business. 

The fee for re-inspection is $100.  While it is true that the Enforcement Officer may issue fines for violations, unlike the inspection reports the fine amounts are not posted on-line.  Concerned neighbors, who hope to engage Pizza Boli’s owner in an on-going dialogue to address issues (as they have been able to do with the owners of Barracks Row’s Chipotle), say that in the past, fines levied have been small, and owners have treated them as part of the cost of doing business.  When Capitol Hill Corner inquired about fines which might have been issued in the case of Pizza Boli’s, Ms. Coleman said the Enforcement Officer in charge was out of the office until July 29th, but pledged to follow-up and “ask him for a contact person who can address any questions pertaining to fines.”

The summary suspension and restoration reports are available on line at:

http://washington.dc.gegov.com/webadmin/dhd_431/web/  Signing in is not necessary – just click on “search health inspections” then click on “P” to list the restaurants by name, and scroll down to the 8th Street Pizza Boli’s (there are routine health inspections listed for seven Pizza Boli’s).

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Week Ahead…..

The Week Ahead…..

by Larry Janezich

It’s a quiet week ahead as we slide into the dog days of August when there will be no meetings of the community organizations regularly covered by Capitol Hill Corner and likely very little news as newsmakers leave the city. 

The National Capital Planning Commission and the DC Office of Planning has announced a public meeting for next week on the work underway for the joint Height Master Plan for Washington, DC.  For the benefit of those in the community following that issue:

Wednesday, July 24

The Planning Commission meets from 10am – noon at the Commission’s offices, 401 9th Street, NW, Suite 500N.  The results of the visual modeling study and economic feasibility analysis will be presented.  There will be no public testimony at this meeting.

Comments Off on The Week Ahead…..

Filed under Uncategorized

DC Department of Health Shuts Down Barracks Row’s Pizza Bolis

Pizza Bolis Ordered To Close by DC Department of Health

Pizza Bolis Ordered To Close by DC Department of Health

 

DC Department of Health Shuts Down Barracks Row’s Pizza Bolis

by Larry Janezich

On Monday, neighbors complained about ongoing rat, garbage and noise issues at Barracks Row’s Pizza Bolis at 417 8th Street, SE.  Today, the carryout was closed by order of the DC Department of Health after an inspection revealed several critical and non-critical violations resulting in a summary order to cease and desist all operations immediately.  A compliance inspection will be conducted after corrections are made and an inspection report will be posted within five days for viewing.  The complaint went to Food Safety and Hygiene Inspection Services, DC Department of Health; ANC6B commissioners; and the Executive Director of Barracks Row/Main Street. 

The complaint specified “uncontained garbage and plastic food bins” behind Pizza Bolis and cited the “many, many years” of ongoing problems with rats and noise pollution from the carryout.  An inspection in January of 2013 following neighbor complaints found numerous violations but a follow-up inspection indicated the problems had been corrected. 

However, as of Monday, the neighbors said, Bolis was storing garbage in open and lidless dumpsters behind the restaurant, which “are creating real health issues, particularly in light of the current heat wave.”  Neighbors also point to the pizza place as the source of a prevalent rat problem evidenced by burrows in the back of neighboring businesses.  In contrast to Pizza Bolis, the neighbors applauded Chipotle, saying “that the garbage disposal procedures (there) are currently very good.”

 

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized